ANTI-CORRUPTION LAW SERIES-43 Latest Case law[06/02/2019}
ANTI-CORRUPTION LAW SERIES-43
Latest Case law-(06/02/2019)
SHIVNARAYAN Vs MANIKLAL & ORS.
Sections 16 and 17 of the C.P.C The suit filed
by the plaintiff for Indore property as well as Bombay property was based on
different causes of action and could not have been clubbed together. Section 16
contains general principle that suits are to be instituted where subject-matter
is situated whereas Section 17 engrafts an exception to the general rule as
occurring in Section 16. SC held, the trial court was justified in holding that
plaintiff has clubbed different causes of action which is to be deleted from
the present suit. The plaintiff was not justified in including different
properties and separate cause of actions combining in single suit. Appeal is
dismissed.
Ashok Bhushan, K.M. Joseph, JJ
6/2/2019 View judgement PDF
S.No
|
Dear development leaders promote activities such as :-
(All forms of corruption must be ended to secure the basic rights of all people and ensure a world where everyone can live in dignity)
|
1.
|
Organize, communicate, and raise awareness on Anti corruption laws to your target people.
|
2.
|
Identify the victims and witnesses of corruption in your working area
|
3.
|
Identify the need of Legal consultancy for Consumer rights, women’s rights, Child rights, aged rights, revenue, education, documents registration, social welfare, public and temple property panchayat, forest, insurance, and all government department corruptions related issues etc
|
4.
|
Contact for such issues with an affidavit and we will make the difference
|
We also know that corruption can’t be rooted out in one big sweep. Rather, fighting it is a step-by-step, project-by-project process.
|
CEO-Anti-Corruption And Human Rights Movement®-Chennai
Mobile: 91 9087856137
Follow us on-
twitter : @anticorp_2007