DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: HUSBAND HAS TO PAY MAINTENANCE EVEN IF WIFE IS WELL EDUCATED [READ THE ORDERS]


Domestic Violence: Husband Has To Pay Maintenance Even If Wife Is Well Educated [Read The Orders]


Supreme Court enhanced substantially an interim maintenance for wife in a domestic violence case despite the fact that the wife was well educated.
A bench of Justice Khanwilkar and Justice Rastogi has passed the order in the case titled as MEGHA KHANDELWAL vs RAJAT KHANDELWAL on 10.05.2019.

Wife filed a domestic violence case. Trial Court awarded her an interim maintenance of Rs. 5000/- per month. Wife was not satisfied with the same. She challenged the order before Sessions Court.
Sessions Court enhanced the maintenance amount to Rs.9000/- per month. Dissatisfied, the wife approached the High Court challenging the maintenance amount.
In the High Court, Counsel for the wife made a wrong submission that income tax return of the husband for certain years were not taken into consideration. High Court found this submission wrong as the ITRs were taken into consideration. High Court found that the wife was well educated (having degree in M.Sc. Biotech and preparing for PHD). High Court also observed that courts below were of the opinion that without evidence being led in the matter, income could not be ascertained but for meeting day to day expenses interim maintenance was granted. High Court then dismissed the petition of the wife.
Dissatisfied again, the wife this time approached the Supreme Court. It is here that she was able to get a substantial increase in the interim maintenance.
Supreme Court held “After having considered the rival submission and taking into account the relevant documents placed before us, we deem it appropriate to enhance the interim maintenance amount to Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) per month to be paid to the Petitioner by the respondent with effect from 01.05.2019 until the final decision in the main proceedings, which is pending before the concerned Court. The amount shall be paid on a regular basis on or before 10th of every English calendar month”.
Supreme Court further ensured early disposal by saying “The Trial Court shall endeavour to decide all the cases pending between the parties being FIR No. 255 of 2016, Case No. 208 of 2016, Complaint Case No. 103 of 2016 and Divorce Petition originally filed in Case No. 30 of 2016, preferably within six months from today. The parties have undertaken before this Court to extend full co-operation to the trial Court for early disposal of the concerned case”.
 Read the High Court order here:-


MANISHANKAR
CEO-ANTI-CORRUPTION AND HUMAN RIGHTS MOVEMENT®-CHENNAI
Email: anticorruption.org2007@gmail.com.
Mobile: 91 9087856137
Follow us on-

twitter : @anticorp_2007

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ANTI-CORRUPTION LAW SERIES-25 [The Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993]

ANTI-CORRUPTION LAW SERIES-36 [Right to Disconnect Bill, 2018]

THE WEEK IN CORRUPTION, 7 JUNE 2019- FROM TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL